Predictive Maintenance of Distributed Energy Sensors through Cloud Telemetry

Authors

  • Vishnu Veeraraghavan Binghamton University (SUNY) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66687/z9dm8x27

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Algorithms, Cloud Computing, Information Storage and Retrieval

Abstract

Distributed energy-monitoring networks collect large amounts of telemetry, yet seasonal load changes can be mistaken for equipment faults. The central research objective is to distinguish actionable sensor degradation from benign demand fluctuations using time-aware predictive maintenance rules. Previous work provides context for sampling, input validation and study boundaries [3–7]. To answer the question, the study proposes a prospective-style replay of multiseason sensor traces with independently logged fault and repair events. Related enterprise-storage studies inform the assessment of operational reliability [1] and the deployment assumptions adopted for system-level comparison [2]. Under matched evaluation conditions, the protocol compares fixed engineering thresholds, statistical change detection and a guarded machine-learning classifier. Methodological sources are used to specify transparent comparison and reporting practices [8–12]. The design prioritises precise operational definitions and a straightforward baseline before introducing more complex alternatives. Performance will be judged using alerts per sensor-month, detection lead time, missed faults and unnecessary maintenance decisions. Interpretation will account for sensor dropout, firmware changes, class imbalance and network interruption during peak loads. Primary analyses would be reported by the main deployment or participant subgroup so that averaged results do not conceal systematic failures. The supplementary technical literature is used to identify plausible failure mechanisms [13–17]. No study result is assumed in advance; the analysis is designed to show both when the method helps and when it fails, with reporting context from the remaining sources [18–23].

References

[1] Mohammed Nazir. (2021). Capacity Reclamation and Thin-Provisioning Efficiency in Large-Scale Enterprise Storage Systems. International Journal of Business & Computational Sciences, 1(1), 15–22. https://ijbcs.org/index.php/IJBCS/article/view/2021P4

[2] Mohammed Nazir. (2024). Scenario-Based Disaster Recovery Training for Improving Incident-Response and RTO/RPO Decision-Making Among Enterprise Cloud Engineers. Journal of Computing, Intelligence and Information Sciences, 5(1). https://jciis.com/index.php/jciis/article/view/2024-01-05

[3] Cidon, A. et al. (2013). Copysets: Reducing the Frequency of Data Loss in Cloud Storage. USENIX ATC '13. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc13/technical-sessions/presentation/cidon

[4] Vrable, M., Savage, S. & Voelker, G.M. (2012). BlueSky: A Cloud-Backed File System for the Enterprise. USENIX FAST '12. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast12/bluesky-cloud-backed-file-system-enterprise

[5] Cao, Z., Kuenning, G. & Zadok, E. (2020). Carver: Finding Important Parameters for Storage System Tuning. USENIX FAST '20. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast20/presentation/cao-zhen

[6] Mahdisoltani, F., Stefanovici, I. & Schroeder, B. (2017). Proactive Error Prediction to Improve Storage System Reliability. USENIX ATC '17. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc17/technical-sessions/presentation/mahdisoltani

[7] Yang, Z. et al. (2023). λ-IO: A Unified IO Stack for Computational Storage. USENIX FAST '23. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast23/presentation/yang-zhe

[8] Maneas, S. et al. (2022). Operational Characteristics of SSDs in Enterprise Storage Systems: A Large-Scale Field Study. USENIX FAST '22. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast22/presentation/maneas

[9] Mihailescu, M., Soundararajan, G. & Amza, C. (2013). MixApart: Decoupled Analytics for Shared Storage Systems. USENIX FAST '13. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast13/technical-sessions/presentation/mihailescu

[10] Jiao, Z. et al. (2024). The Design and Implementation of a Capacity-Variant Storage System. USENIX FAST '24. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast24/presentation/jiao

[11] Li, N. et al. (2022). Speculative Recovery: Cheap, Highly Available Fault Tolerance with Disaggregated Storage. USENIX ATC '22. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc22/presentation/li-nanqinqin

[12] Nachman, A., Yadgar, G. & Sheinvald, S. (2020). GoSeed: Generating an Optimal Seeding Plan for Deduplicated Storage. USENIX FAST '20. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast20/presentation/nachman

[13] Tai, A. et al. (2019). Who's Afraid of Uncorrectable Bit Errors? Online Recovery of Flash Errors with Distributed Redundancy. USENIX ATC '19. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/tai

[14] Alagappan, R. et al. (2019). Protocol-Aware Recovery for Consensus-Based Storage. USENIX ATC '19. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/alagappan

[15] Patel, T. et al. (2020). Uncovering Access, Reuse, and Sharing Characteristics of I/O-Intensive Files on Large-Scale Production HPC Systems. USENIX FAST '20. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast20/presentation/patel-hpc-systems

[16] Rodriguez, L.V. et al. (2021). Learning Cache Replacement with CACHEUS. USENIX FAST '21. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast21/presentation/rodriguez

[17] Abdi, M. et al. (2021). A Community Cache with Complete Information. USENIX FAST '21. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast21/presentation/abdi

[18] Mahmud, T. et al. (2023). ConfD: Analyzing Configuration Dependencies of File Systems for Fun and Profit. USENIX FAST '23. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast23/presentation/mahmud

[19] Dai, Y. et al. (2024). Symbiosis: The Art of Application and Kernel Cache Cooperation. USENIX FAST '24. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast24/presentation/dai

[20] Wong, D.L.-K. et al. (2024). Baleen: ML Admission & Prefetching for Flash Caches. USENIX FAST '24. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast24/presentation/wong

[21] Li, X. et al. (2023). ParaRC: Embracing Sub-Packetization for Repair Parallelization in MSR-Coded Storage. USENIX FAST '23. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast23/presentation/li-xiaolu

[22] Bai, W. et al. (2023). Empowering Azure Storage with RDMA. USENIX NSDI '23. https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi23/presentation/bai

[23] Wu, K. et al. (2021). The Storage Hierarchy is Not a Hierarchy: Optimizing Caching on Modern Storage Devices with Orthus. USENIX FAST '21. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast21/presentation/wu-kan

Published

2024-03-15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 121

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.