Predictive Maintenance of Distributed Energy Sensors through Cloud Telemetry: An Audit-Ready Methods Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66687/63b5bh18Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Algorithms, Cloud Computing, Information Storage and RetrievalAbstract
Distributed energy-monitoring networks collect large amounts of telemetry, yet seasonal load changes can be mistaken for equipment faults. The difficulty is particularly visible when a system is transferred to a new setting. To address this, the study will distinguish actionable sensor degradation from benign demand fluctuations using time-aware predictive maintenance rules. The research design centres on a prospective-style replay of multiseason sensor traces with independently logged fault and repair events. The choice of evaluation units and exclusion criteria is informed by the broader methodological record [3–7]. The analysis will contrast fixed engineering thresholds, statistical change detection and a guarded machine-learning classifier. The audit-focused extension preserves processing logs, model decisions and exception handling for independent review. Related enterprise-storage studies inform the assessment of operational reliability [1] and the deployment assumptions adopted for system-level comparison [2]. Assessment will focus on alerts per sensor-month, detection lead time, missed faults and unnecessary maintenance decisions. The supporting evidence base motivates the chosen comparator conditions and robustness criteria [8–12]. Critical sensitivity checks address sensor dropout, firmware changes, class imbalance and network interruption during peak loads. Further systems and modelling literature supplies context for the proposed sensitivity analyses [13–17]. Uncertain outcomes would be adjudicated with a predefined rubric, rather than silently recoded as successes. The expected output is a reusable evaluation framework with transparent uncertainty and reporting rules, informed by wider reproducibility literature [18–23].
References
[1] Mohammed Nazir. (2021). Capacity Reclamation and Thin-Provisioning Efficiency in Large-Scale Enterprise Storage Systems. International Journal of Business & Computational Sciences, 1(1), 15–22. https://ijbcs.org/index.php/IJBCS/article/view/2021P4
[2] Mohammed Nazir. (2022). SVM-Based Disaster Recovery for Hybrid Enterprise Storage: Effects on Recovery Time and Service Availability. Journal of Computing, Intelligence and Information Sciences, 3(1). https://jciis.com/index.php/jciis/article/view/2022-01-05
[3] Vrable, M., Savage, S. & Voelker, G.M. (2012). BlueSky: A Cloud-Backed File System for the Enterprise. USENIX FAST '12. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast12/bluesky-cloud-backed-file-system-enterprise
[4] Cidon, A. et al. (2013). Copysets: Reducing the Frequency of Data Loss in Cloud Storage. USENIX ATC '13. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc13/technical-sessions/presentation/cidon
[5] Chen, W. et al. (2025). IMPRESS: An Importance-Informed Multi-Tier Prefix KV Storage System for Large Language Model Inference. USENIX FAST '25. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast25/presentation/chen-weijian-impress
[6] Hao, Y. et al. (2026). Fast Cloud Storage for AI Jobs via Grouped I/O API with Transparent Read/Write Optimizations. USENIX FAST '26. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast26/presentation/hao
[7] Mihailescu, M., Soundararajan, G. & Amza, C. (2013). MixApart: Decoupled Analytics for Shared Storage Systems. USENIX FAST '13. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast13/technical-sessions/presentation/mihailescu
[8] Jiao, Z. et al. (2024). The Design and Implementation of a Capacity-Variant Storage System. USENIX FAST '24. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast24/presentation/jiao
[9] Qin, R. et al. (2025). Mooncake: Trading More Storage for Less Computation — A KVCache-centric Architecture for Serving LLM Chatbot. USENIX FAST '25. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast25/presentation/qin
[10] Burke, Q. et al. (2025). On Scalable Integrity Checking for Secure Cloud Disks. USENIX FAST '25. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast25/presentation/burke
[11] Cao, Z., Kuenning, G. & Zadok, E. (2020). Carver: Finding Important Parameters for Storage System Tuning. USENIX FAST '20. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast20/presentation/cao-zhen
[12] Mahdisoltani, F., Stefanovici, I. & Schroeder, B. (2017). Proactive Error Prediction to Improve Storage System Reliability. USENIX ATC '17. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc17/technical-sessions/presentation/mahdisoltani
[13] Yang, Z. et al. (2023). λ-IO: A Unified IO Stack for Computational Storage. USENIX FAST '23. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast23/presentation/yang-zhe
[14] Azam, M. A., Kaur, G., & Roy, K. K. (2026). Cloud-Native Data Architecture: Optimizing Enterprise Analytics Using Multi-Cloud Data Warehousing Platforms. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8(9), 86–115. https://usajournal.net/index.php/tujtajet/article/view/1881
[15] Maneas, S. et al. (2022). Operational Characteristics of SSDs in Enterprise Storage Systems: A Large-Scale Field Study. USENIX FAST '22. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast22/presentation/maneas
[16] Jiao, B., Goel, A. & Wang, A.-I.A. (2025). Silhouette: Leveraging Consistency Mechanisms to Detect Bugs in Persistent Memory-Based File Systems. USENIX FAST '25. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast25/presentation/jiao
[17] Li, X. et al. (2023). ParaRC: Embracing Sub-Packetization for Repair Parallelization in MSR-Coded Storage. USENIX FAST '23. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast23/presentation/li-xiaolu
[18] Bai, W. et al. (2023). Empowering Azure Storage with RDMA. USENIX NSDI '23. https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi23/presentation/bai
[19] Wu, K. et al. (2021). The Storage Hierarchy is Not a Hierarchy: Optimizing Caching on Modern Storage Devices with Orthus. USENIX FAST '21. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast21/presentation/wu-kan
[20] Li, N. et al. (2022). Speculative Recovery: Cheap, Highly Available Fault Tolerance with Disaggregated Storage. USENIX ATC '22. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc22/presentation/li-nanqinqin
[21] Nachman, A., Yadgar, G. & Sheinvald, S. (2020). GoSeed: Generating an Optimal Seeding Plan for Deduplicated Storage. USENIX FAST '20. https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast20/presentation/nachman
[22] Tai, A. et al. (2019). Who's Afraid of Uncorrectable Bit Errors? Online Recovery of Flash Errors with Distributed Redundancy. USENIX ATC '19. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/tai
[23] Alagappan, R. et al. (2019). Protocol-Aware Recovery for Consensus-Based Storage. USENIX ATC '19. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/alagappan
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meng Wang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright in their published work. Unless an individual Version of Record identifies different terms, JMRIS articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This permits sharing and adaptation, including commercial use, with appropriate attribution, a link to the license, and indication of changes. Third-party material may be subject to separate terms. Existing articles retain the license originally granted to their Version of Record; a policy update does not retrospectively replace that license.